Three issues have dominated discussion of anthropology in the book of Ezekiel: the traumatic experience of involuntary migration to Babylonia; the capacity or incapacity of humans to act correctly of their own volition; and the role of the imago Dei concept in Ezekiel’s understanding of human beings. Unlike existing work, this paper will integrate these three topics into a single argument. These three foci, when woven together, indicate that the book of Ezekiel holds an optimistic view of human capacity to act correctly, which is separate from the imago Dei concept, but still thoroughly theological. Furthermore, the book projects these human features onto YHWH, resulting in a divine figure who closely resembles the human ideal advocated in the book. Ezekiel, in short, contains a theological anthropology and an anthropological theology.

In 1935, Frederic Hood, the House's then Principal, commissioned his friend Ninian Comper to reorder the Chapel of the Blessed Sacrament at Pusey House. The resulting scheme, complete with its golden ciborium, is a perfect example of Comper’s later style: ‘unity by inclusion’ - a stylistic conclusion that Comper arrived at having realised that all religious art was consonantly connected through the same divine inspiration. This lecture, presented by the Architectural Historian (and former Sacristan of the House), Harry Spain will examine the theory and significance of Comper’s work here, tracing his sources of inspiration from 4th century Algeria to Botticelli, whilst also exploring Comper’s connexion to Oxford and the work of Pusey House itself.

Winner of the highly prestigious Holberg Prize in 2019, Paul Gilroy is an eminent public intellectual and one of the world’s leading scholars of race and racism. Professor Gilroy will reflect on the need to recover a notion of shared humanity and what he calls “reparative humanism.” This Public Lecture is presented by the McDonald Centre for Theology, Ethics and Public Life, to open its Annual Conference 2025.

You are a person, I am a person, but what is a person? (and why does it matter?) Fourteen-hundred years ago Boethius said 'person' is the 'individual substance of a rational nature / rationalis naturae individua substantia'. Boethius' Aristotelian conception of the person was then re-affirmed by St Thomas Aquinas in the high middle ages, and thereby carried through into the modern age as a necessary part of Latin Trinitarian theology. For us, 'person' still means 'an individual rational being'. But it also implies much more, such as the dignity and the relationality and --lately but most importantly -- the unicity, of such a creature. This lecture will ask how native are these scholastic and modern developments to the Boethian definition of 'person', and whether the Boethian definition is still fit for purpose.

English theologian E.L. Mascall wrote in a number of his works on what it means to be human in a fallen and redeemed world, beginning in his very early work Death or Dogma, and a little later in Via Media. But he treats the matter most fully in his ‘American Bamptons’ of 1958, which were published in Britain under the title, The Importance of Being Human. Is man nothing more than ‘the successful cosmic bandit’, or is he ‘the uniquely favoured creature upon whom God has stamped his own image’? We will see how Mascall answers his own question!

"Begotten not made, of one being with the Father"... is a crucial but perplexing phrase in the Nicene Creed. What does it mean, why was it so important (and controversial) and how did we end up with the doctrine of the Trinity? The answers are to be found in the heated 4th century debate which arose following the condemnation of the preaching of a popular Egyptian priest named Arius. Beginning Pusey House’s series of events marking the 1700th Anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, (which will continue in Michaelmas 2025), this Study Day will commence by providing an overview of what Arius taught and why, before examining the initial response of the Church and the text of the original Nicene creed. However, within a few years, the “consensus” reached at Nicaea was rejected by a number of different groups within the Church, and over more than 50 years, the search for alternative formulations continued. Numerous councils were held during this time, often resulting in one or more “better” creeds which were received with varying degrees of success. An overview of a number of these additional councils, and their alternative formulations, will be provided, in order to bring out the different sides of the debate. The end of this period of intense debate and controversy was marked by the classical expression of Trinitarian faith in the creed produced at the council of Constantinople (in 381 AD). The course will therefore end with a comparison of this creed with the one produced at Nicaea. Who is the course aimed at? Anyone who’s read this far and is still interested! A complete lack of previous experience or study is assumed, although clergy, lay readers or others with some knowledge will still find much of interest.

This lecture will explore how Augustine’s understanding of the voice and its relevance for a Christian public presence interacts with a broader Christological understanding of the human person and its forms of expression. Traditional sources like conf. and scholarly milestones like P. Burnell’s The Augustinian Person (CUP 1992) will be combined with fresh insights drawn from Augustine’s sermonic commentaries on Scripture.